Home» » Com Files Msjavx86 Exeter

Com Files Msjavx86 Exeter

0Home
Com Files Msjavx86 Exeter Average ratng: 3,9/5 3199votes

My system: Windows7 x64 (fresh install - so no previous JRE's or JDK's), Firefox 15.0.1 and IE9 I downloaded this: jdk-7u7-windows-x64.exe From this page: [I installed the JDK as per instructions on this page: [I updated the PATH environment variable to include: C: Program Files Java jdk1.7.0_07 bin I restarted the computer. I checked cmd for java -version, it reports: java version '1.7.0_07' java SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_07-b11) etc. I tried to view applets in Firefox and IE and they both report that I have to download the Java plugin. IN Firefox I click 'Install plugin' and it looks like it's installing, but then it fails. It then gives me an option to install it manually (which is a link to the Oracle JRE download page. I did not try that last option because I SHOULD NOT HAVE TO, Oracle's page clearly states [that the JDK INCLUDES the JRE.

Com Files Msjavx86 Exeter

If you want to develop Java applications, download the Java Development Kit, or JDK. *The JDK includes the JRE, so you do not have to download both separately.*' Also, it the latest JDK is supposed to come with JavaFX development capabilities, but I don't see JavaFX stuff in any of the Java folders. I have some questions about installing JDK 1.4: 1. After running the executable installation file, you get a src.zip file in the installation directory. Does anyone know what this is? The obvious answer is that it is the library of code for JDK 1.4.

However, I have run programs on Forte Agent without unzipping this file. In previous versions of the JDK, when you decompress the src.jar (it is now a src.zip file in the 1.4 version) file, it creates a src folder and decompresses all the information into that.

However, in JDK 1.4, it does not create a src folder, but rather, decompresses the files into the installation directory. Is this a fault of the new release or should I create a src folder and have the src.zip file decompress into that folder? I am running Windows 2000. I have some questions about installing JDK 1.4: 1. After running the executable installation file, you get a src.zip file in the installation directory. Does anyone know what this is? The obvious answer is that it is the library of code for JDK 1.4.

Top file variants for msjavx86.exe. Users Filename Product Company Version Variant; 100%. Please click this link msjavx86.exe to down load JVM.

However, I have run programs on Forte Agent without unzipping this file.The src.zip is the source code for the JDK, not library. Note: The file is not the whole source code, it does not have any native library so you cannot compile it. In previous versions of the JDK, when you decompress the src.jar (it is now a src.zip file in the 1.4 version) file, it creates a src folder and decompresses all the information into that. However, in JDK 1.4, it does not create a src folder, but rather, decompresses the files into the installation directory. Is this a fault of the new release or should I create a src folder and have the src.zip file decompress into that folder? I am running Windows 2000.No, it is just how Sun zip it. Anyway, as long as you don't care to look at the source, you can just leave it along.

User7821113 wrote: I have seen lots of posts on this issue but no real solution. I was able to installed jdk-7u1-windows-i586.exe just fine but jdk-7u2-windows-i586.exe does nothing. I have run it from the command line, and by double clicking the icon but nothing, no windows, errors or anything.

Nothing in the the event logs.What sort of thing do you expect? Executing jdk-7u2-windows-i586.exe installs the Java runtime (JRE) and the Java compiler. After this the file jdk-7u2-windows-i586.exe can be removed.

This will allow you compile and execute Java programs. Does Oracle have a solution for this problem??I think the problem is your expectation. I'm currently testing JBDS 7 on a freshly installed Mac Book Pro running OS X 10.8.5 [I've also tried with Mavericks, with the same result]. In order to install JBDS 7, you need to have java installed in order to run the command: java -jar InstallerFile_for_JBDS7.jar So I downloaded the JDK 7_40 from Oracle and installed it. When I wanted to run JBDS 7 I get a message stating that in order to run I must install JDK 6, at that time OS X offers to download a JDK directly from Apple and after it is installed then I'm able to run JDBS 7.

Com Files Msjavx86 Exeter

This behavior is not consistent with the Windows version - If you have JDK 7 installed, you're able to lunch JDBS 7 without issues. Can you guys shed some light to what the dependencies for JDK 6 on OS X for JBDS 7 are? How can I make run directly on JDK 7, without having to install JDK 6.

* As a side note, by installing JDK 6, you get a 32 bit version of Java - that is not present on JDK 7. This allows you to re-install JBDS 7 on OS X and get back the Visual Page Editor by selecting to run JBDS 7 with JDK 6 (32bit).

Regards, Luis. I was able to connect to oracle 8.1.7 by adding ojdbc14.jar to the weblogic classpath. If the weblogic classpath cannot be changed then simple add the above jar to web-inf/lib of your war and also change you weblogic.xml to add: container-descriptor prefer-web-inf-classestrue/prefer-web-inf-classes /container-descriptor This will ensure that the ojdbc14.jar is used to return an instance of Oracle driver from the class loader. For detailed information please visit: http://dumpingbrain.blogspot.com/2010/03/connecting-to-oracle-817-from.html.

Hi guys, I'm having a bit of trouble installing JDK 6 update 11 Windows x64. I previously had some beta of version 10, but I uninstalled all copies of Java before installing this one. Unfortunately, I can't install update 11. I tried installing the JRE separately and that worked, but even then if I try to install the JDK afterwards and deselect the JRE the installation still fails. This is a pretty annoying problem for me. I know I could install the x86 version but I'm leaving that as a last resort, since the x64 builds used to work fine for me.

Hi, We have Brava installed on our current Webtop 5.3 SP2 and the guide says as follows: Brava! Am trying to install jdk 1.4 or jdk1.5 in windows vista for so many times.

But always getting error like this. It first says 'unable to set file time stamp' then flags this error Error 1722. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A program run as part of the setup did not finish as expected. Contact your support personnel or package vendor. Tried installing all jdk versions tried installing by taking new jdk from sun.com too.

Please help in installing the jdk in my s/m. Thanks sanjeev. Hi Vinod, Thanks for the reply.

Actually, we have tried with JDK 1.4.2, sapinst throws error that JDK is not valid for the platform. But, I just read that the windows environment variable PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE is set to AMD64 by default, even if the processor is actually Intel (which is, in our case). So, we will manually set the PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE to IA64 and install JDK 1.4.2 and run SAPINST from IA64 directory. I have a feeling that this will work. Otherwise, I'll be back here. Regards Partha.

Hi, i have tried installing JDK 1.6 from sun.com,and whenever i am trying to install it on my vista home premium OS it is showing the following failures 1)data1.cab is corrupted and u cannot install the JDK,and an error number 1335 is coming on the screen 2)After i clicked ignore its saying that and internal error 2350 has been occured 3)I have cleaned my registry and i have also removed the UAC check box, and even i have used 'Run As Administrator' option for installing the software, but i have not yet been successful. So please help me to solve my problem. Thanks in Advance Raghuveer. They both contain the same JDK of course, the difference being the delivery/install mechanism. The 'RPM' is suitable for linux distributions that use the Redhat Package Manager to install/update executable packages. The file without the rpm 'jdk-6u27-linux-i586.bin' is a self extracting file and is useful for all distributions, especially those that do not use RPM. The install instructions are at the same location where you picked up the install files.

Hi, I am trying to install sun one webserver 6.1 SP5 on my system which has windows XP operating system for the development work. The JDK version i am using is JDK1.6. While installing sun one webserver at step where i can use custom java development kit i am providing path for the JDK1.6 in 'JDK Path' text box as 'C: Java jdk1.6.0_11'. While clicking next it throws me error 'The version of selected JDK is too old'. I don;t have any other version of JDK installed on my system. Can any one tell me what can be the problem here? Regards, Nemish.

WLS 7.0 SP1 is certified with only the 1.3.1 version JRockit 7.0, and not the 1.4.0 version. 'Frank Burrup' frank@abacus.co.uk wrote in message news:3d85cecf$1@newsgroups.bea.com. Hi these posts have me a little confused is weblogic 7.001 supported withJRockit 7 (1.4.0 compatible flavour). This would be good because my client isusing 1.4 exceptions Michael Reply@ToNewsgroup.Only wrote: Hi Jon. JRockit 7 comes in 2 flavors - 1.3.1 compatible and 1.4.0 compatible, each available as a separate download. Regards, Michael Quantos Quattro wrote: Hi, One of the recent announcements for JRocket has in its web page: * BEA WebLogic Server 7.0 SP1 o Microsoft Windows 2000 SP2 (JDK 1.3.1) and then later it has * Microsoft Windows 2000 SP2 o JDK 1.3.1 1.4 o Intel Pentium / Xeon (IA32) servers So does JRocket support 1.4 features then? Dear Sun, I switched lately to Mac OS X and I was thinking the support of JDK 1.6 will be there, but as we know there is not and Apple does not post any information about it and instead they relesead JDK 5 with Leopard.

I think is coming the same case as was before with Java and Microsoft. Where is the WORA philosophy that Sun promised on all platforms including Mac? Sun develop the Windows, Linux and Solaris JDK's but why not the Mac one? Becuase Apple decided to do it that is goofy move IMHO. Please Sun take the control of the JDK on the Mac and please do something about it so we have a bright Java future on the Mac and continue to promise the WORA philosophy. I want JDK 1.6 on the Mac from SUN not Apple.

Best Regards. HiWe tried installing OBIEE 11.1.1.7.1 on Windows 2008 R2 X64 in the following two ways with both of them failed at 'Create Domain' step. I suppose some patch needs to be applied after the Weblogic server Installation (wls1036_win32) as mentioned in the 'Process 2' below. But have no further information like patch details etc to take it forward. It would be very helpful if any workaround for this is provided. Thanks!Process 1:i) jdk installation (jdk-7u51-windows-x64)ii) Oracle 11G DB installationiii) RCU Installationiv) OBIEE Enterprise InstallationProcess 2:i) jdk installation (jdk-7u51-windows-x64)ii) Oracle 11G DB installationiii) RCU Installationiv) Weblogic server Installation (wls1036_win32)iv) OBIEE Software Only Installationv) Execution of Config.bat. Env: W7 - 64 bit Oracle DB 11.2.0.1 (Enterprise Ed) installed JDK 1.6_0.30 installed WLS 10.3.5 generic version installed using JDK 1.6_0.30.

RCU 11.1.1.5.0 (installed) SOA 11.1.1.5.0 generic (error installing) I am getting compability error. Is JDK 1.6_0.30 compatible with SOA 11.1.1.5.0?

I know that SOA 11.1.1.5.0 works on JDK 1.6_0.25. Can I go ahead and install JDK 1.6_0.25 and uninstall WLS and RCU and Reinstall WLS, RCU and SOA. Or keep already installed WLS, RCU and continue SOA on JDK 1.6_0.25. Now, in this case I will have WLS on 30 and SOA on 25.

Will they work? Sir, It is true that the command line to install the JRE do not apply to the JDK. The only solution that I find to install my PCs with the JDK into a specific folder other than the 'C: Program Files ' folder was to install first the JRE then install the JDK. I don't know why but it's works. So I know that I have got a JRE that IE and Fireofx use to run applet and an other JDK (which include the JRE) for development. It is not perfect and it manages my case (JRE available into IE and Fireofx for applet) and a JDK development; both install into d: java folder. That may be can help you.

If you want talk about that, send me a email to essaidetestayahoo.fr Cheers Pierre JEAN (Sorry for my incorrect english, I am a french guy). Hi, I tried to install the Oracle Developer Suite 10g (10.1.2.0.2) on a Windows XP SP2 64 bit machine. After the installation, when I try to start the form, I get the following Error FRM-18103: Failed to initialize the Development Environment and FRM -10039 Error.

Any suggestions? Hello all, I am running Slackware 10 system on an intel celeron machine. I am trying to install jdk but I am getting the following errors: Unpacking. UnZipSFX 5.50 of 17 February 2002, by Info-ZIP (Zip-Bugs@lists.wku.edu). Replace jdk-6u4-linux-i586.rpm?

Pavtube Media Magician V1.0.0.751 Final Serial[hunterstorm]. [y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename: a error: invalid response [a] replace jdk-6u4-linux-i586.rpm? Joshiv wrote: Hello all, I am running Slackware 10 system on an intel celeron machine. I am trying to install jdk but I am getting the following errors: Unpacking. UnZipSFX 5.50 of 17 February 2002, by Info-ZIP (Zip-Bugs@lists.wku.edu). Replace jdk-6u4-linux-i586.rpm? [y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename: a error: invalid response [a] replace jdk-6u4-linux-i586.rpm?

[y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename: All inflating: jdk-6u4-linux-i586.rpm inflating: sun-javadb-common-10.3.1-4.1.i386.rpm inflating: sun-javadb-core-10.3.1-4.1.i386.rpm inflating: sun-javadb-client-10.3.1-4.1.i386.rpm inflating: sun-javadb-demo-10.3.1-4.1.i386.rpm inflating: sun-javadb-docs-10.3.1-4.1.i386.rpm inflating: sun-javadb-javadoc-10.3.1-4.1.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies. /bin/sed is needed by jdk-1.6.0_04-fcs. Done.I just experienced the same problem with jdk-6u7-linux-i586-rpm.bin on a SuSE Linux 10.0. RPM complained about a missing dependency to /bin/sed. Extract the jdk-rpm.bin to the.rpm file (sh jdk-*-rpm.bin -x will do this, no need for root) and then try a sudo rpm --nodeps -ivf./jdk-*.rpm. You will want to take a look on the warnings and fix the files created by former installs (i.e..system.lock) by hand.

Hi, I'm assuming that you also installed a 32bit version of Java and the 32bit version comes first in the path. In order to solve this issue you can explicitely point to the 64Bit version of the JDK: Edit the eclipse.ini file in c: intel BeaconMountain ADT eclipse. Add the parameter vm which points to your 64 bit java installation (you might need to adjust the path): -vm C: Program Files Java jdk1.7.0_01 bin javaw.exe The position of the parameter is important. Hello,I was installing Oracle Enterprise Pack for Eclipse 12.1.2.1-kepler when Norton 360 flagged one of the files during installation. I did do two screen captures but I can't find anywhere to upload them so I'll manually post the information here.Threat:Suspicious.Cloud.7.EPc: oracle middleware oracle_home oracle_common jdk jre bin javacpl Removed.My question is, what should I do now. A dialog box came up and said that 'This program might not have installed correctly'. It gives me an option to reinstall but I'm afraid it might happen again.

Any suggestions, or if this is the wrong place to post this, I would appreciate anyone showing me where.I am running Windows 7(SP1) 32-bit, and I downloaded all the patches that Microsoft sent out via Windows update a couple of days ago.Thanks! Yeah, java mappings doesn't work in jdk 5.0, when i am on XI 3.0.Even, IR ID components doesn't work/openup with jdk 5.0 versions. They need jdk 1.4.

My issue is, we are on XI 3.0 have installed jdk 1.4 for accessing IR ID compoenents in Integration builder. It is working fine. But, when i want to install SAP NWDS, it needs JDK 5.0 update 11. I installed jdk 5.0 as well.

After installing jdk 5.0, integration builder(IB) is trying to access new version of JDK(5.0) bcos of that, IR ID are not working.any solutions/rectifications for this issue...... I am installing SAP Solution Manager 7.0 on Windows 2003 Server R2 Enterprise x64 and Oracle 10.2.0.4 Patch 8 During the installation its asking me to install a JDK and enter the location. But when I give the path C: j2sdk1.4.2_12 it says this JDK does not support the 64-bit data model! I have already installed 64-bit PI 7.1 without errors on this same host with this same JDK and OS/DB 2. I searched for 64-bit JDK but only JDK 6 is available and I dont think SAP supports this yet. Besides, I understand that 64-bit JDK is specially available only for SAP customers but I am unable to find it on service.sap/swdc 4. I searched SAP Note 723909 as mentioned in the installation guide but could not get much info out of it.

Can someone tell me how to proceed? I am new to SAP and one of our requirements is to have Solution Manager for installing enhancement packs for ERP. I am installing Solution Manager 7.0 EHP1 on windows server 2008 R2. During installation at a certain point I am asked to provide the JDK folder. The JDK needed has to be between 1.4.2_09 -- 1.5.0_00. I was able to find Java JDK like 1.4.2_17 but its 32 bit.

I need JDK which is the above range but for x64.Though I can continue with higher version of JDK but its not recommended. I have looked around but cannot find any JDK in the range mentioned above. I am sure other ppl have installed the solution manager on Windows Server 2008 R2 successfully. Can someone please point or direct me to a link where I can find the x64 JDK which is suitable for the installation.

Any tips would be appreciated. Hi All, I am working on installing ODI on windows 64 bit. I downloaded lastest web logic server files, ODI files and JDK files from oracle site. I installed Web Logice server with no errors but when I tried to install ODI by running the setup.exe it was giving me an error: 'Error: Provide the JDK/JRE Location while launching the installer. Invoke the sertup.exe with -jreLoc JDK/JRE Location absolute pathParameter(s)'. So, I looked in to JDK file and noticed that it is an old file and need to be updated so I installed 'jdk-7uf-windows-i586.exe'. After installing when I try to setup ODI, I am still getting the same error.

It is asking me to provide the location but I am not srue where to provide the location. I know the location for JDK i.e. C: Program files Java jdk1.7.0_04 but I am not sure where to provide this location for ODI. Thanks a lot! Hi Chirag, What error do the updates fail with?

Step 1: Locate the installation error code. To do this, follow these steps: a.

Click Start, click All Programs, and then click Windows Update or Microsoft Update. On the Windows Update Web site or on the Microsoft Update Web site, click Review your update history. A window opens that shows all the updates that have been installed or that have failed to install on the computer. In the Status column of this window, locate the update that failed to install, and then click the red X.

A new window opens that displays the installation error code. Note the error number.

You will have to type or paste the error number in a search box in the next step. Step 2: Follow steps from the article mentioned below. How to troubleshoot failures updating your Office installation from the Office Update Web site. One of my clients are experiencing following error. Any directions for the solution are appreciated. [Error Details]Error occurs while installing BOEXI3.0 Fix Pack 2 Message: 'The installation source for this product is not available.Verify that the source exits and that you can access it.'

[Server Environment Information] BusinessObjects: BusinessObjects Enterprise XI3.0 Fix Pack 1 OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 Service Pack2 DB: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition WebApp: Tomcat JDK: J2SE Development Kit 5.0 Update 16 JRE: J2SE Runtime Environment 5.0 Update 16 DBClient: Microsoft SQL Server Native Client *Both client and server components are installed on same machine. So when they retry, it asks for FP2 replace as the file already exists, a bit wierd situation. Regards, Rahul. Attempting to upgrade java from the AUR I get the following errors: == Installing package jdk with pacman-color -U. Loading packages. Resolving dependencies.

Looking for inter-conflicts.:: jdk and jre are in conflict (java-runtime). [y/N] y Targets (2): jre-7.9-1 [removal] jdk-7.9-2 Total Installed Size: 223.93 MiB Net Upgrade Size: 8.15 MiB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y (1/1) checking package integrity (1/1) loading package files (1/1) checking for file conflicts error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/COPYRIGHT exists in filesystem jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/LICENSE exists in filesystem jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME-JAVAFX.txt exists in filesystem jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.txt exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. Hi friends, After successful installation and configuration of informatica server and client with help of Expert Svee. Next i started to install DAC But while clicking the setup.exe file for installing it, it gives me a below error in a cmd prompt like checkdir error: cannot create C:/DOCUMEN~1 ADMIN~1 LOCALS~1 Temp 1 OracInstall/jdk/ unable to process jdk/COPYRIGHT unable to process jdk/LICENSE unable to process jdk/LICENSE.rtf unable to process jdk/README.html unable to process jdk/README_ja.html unable to process jdk/README_zh_CN.html unable to process jdk//THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.txtIm not sure with the problem, what might be the problem.

Thanks in advance. Regards, Saro. Hi all, Sorry to post my message in between.

We have a problem with windows 2008 server R2 64bit. We have installed Oralce 11g Fusion Middleware successfully and we are able to test the form in the server.(I mean we ran a form in the browser in the server itself.) When we try to run from other network computers it doesn't work. We don't know whether it is a win2k8 issue or Oracle issue. Can anyone help us. For other people who wants to know the installation steps follow this link Thanks Regards, Raja. I need a procedure to silently installing both JDK and JRE on Windows Server 2003 (and I want to be able to specify the specific install directories for both JDK and JRE). The Deployment Guide only describes to perform a silent install of JRE: A possible solution.: Performing a manual install using jdk-1_5_0_04-windows-i586-p.exe gives me exactly the setup I want.

Is it possible to record a response file during manual install and then perform a silent install using that response file? Comments, howtos and links are greatly appreciated! I'm trying to install Java 5. Ariston Atd 104 Service Manual. 0 on my Windows NT Workstation 4.0 box, but I can't get the installer to work.

If I try the combined Netbeans 4.0 beta 2 and JDK 5.0 installer, it installs Netbeans fine, but then stops and complains that there 'may have been an error installing' JDK 5.0 and tells me to look in install.log. Unfortunately, it hasn't created an install.log file. If I try the separate Windows Offline installer for JDK 5.0, I get the splash screen and the harddisk rattles a while, but then I get a dialog asking me where it can find the 'Java 2 SDK, SE v1.5.0.msi' file. I can't find that file anywhere so I have no choice but to click Cancel. What's going on?

Is there some installer-less version of the JDK somewhere which I can use? Can I cause the installer to run correctly? I finally figured it out (no thanks to Sun). The problem was that the installer thought that the Java 5 beta was still installed. I did have the beta installed, but I deleted it before running the Java 5 installer. It wasn't listed in add/remove programs, but apparently it was listed in some MSI configuration file somewhere. I had to download Microsoft's Windows Install Clean Up tool from to remove the Java 5 beta from the MSI installed applications list.

After that, the Java 5 installer ran fine. Iam installling EIM setup on single server deployment (all in one server). Followed prerequsiite. -Started with *Operating system (OS) Microsoft® Windows® 2003 (SP2 or higher) *Edition: Standard *Version: 32-bit -JDBC driver Microsoft® SQL Server® 2005 -Java JDK 1.6 (Update 21 or higher) Started the config with copy.zip from the 'Application folder ',copied renamed 'default' folder towards the instance under same server path. Ran setup file from the CD. Setup is prompting me with the below window: 1)BEA installer - I havent seen any plugin for the BEA weblogic from the installer CD.

2) Since this is the start of the instalation, while during one of my repetative attempts of installing EIM prmpted for 'file server hostname',- IAM not sure what needs to entered @ this particular stage. Please advice on your suggestion, if anyone already installed EIM WIM in all in one server. After installing AndroidStudio, JDK, Android SDK, ANT and setting up the necessary environment in windows 7, Visual Studio 2010 returns error as below: The add-in 'visual studio addin for android ver 1.0' failed to load or cuased an exception. Would you like to remove this Add-in? If you choose yes, the file was loaded from 'C: ProgramData Microsoft VisualStudio 8.0 Addns AndroidDotNet.AddIn' will be renamed. Error Message: The application has failed to start because its side-by-side configuration is incorrect. 800736b1 Please advise on this error.

I've got a problem while installing JDK7u4 x64. It worked fine when I installed it on a desktop with win 7 Pro (64) but when I tried to upgrade the JDK on my laptop (also working with win 7 Pro 64), it failed!

I've got the windows warning panel where I have to click OK and then. Nothing happens!

No upgrade of JDK and no JavaFX installed. With an older installer, I succeeded to install JDK 7 (7.0.0) but, there is no way to install javaFX SDK. I did try to uninstall Java from the laptop and, then, to install the JDK 7u4 x64 but it was also a failure.

I tried with the JDK 7u4 32 to check and it was also a failure. Did anyone else have this kind of trouble? Thanks for your help. Hello guys, Im trying to install SQL Developer on my old Windows Vista SP1 but as soon as I run it I got a message: Cannot find a J2SE SDK installed at path C: Program Files Java jre6 I was reading a post and this problem could be solved by installing the JDK. I went to the Java Archive Download website (and I downloaded 3 versions but none of them are working. Therere tons of them and I really dont know which one should be the one to be installed in order to get the SQL Developer working.

Any chance someone can help me solve this issue? These are the errors I got when I run the installers: Jdk-6u26-windows-i586 error: D: Java JDK jdk-6u26-windows-i586.exe is not a valid Win 32 application. Size of the file downloaded: 7140KB Jdk-6u26-windows-x64 error: The version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows youre running. Check your computers system information to see whether you need an x86 (32-bit) or x64(64-bit) version of the program, and then contact the software publisher. (I was quite careless downloading this version cause I know my computer is 32-bit or x86) size of the file downloaded: 69,043KB Jdk-6u37-windows-i586 error: D: Java JDK jdk-6u37-windows-i586.exe is not a valid Win 32 application sizeof the file downloaded: 67,756KB Thanks loads. My company is developing big project using WLS 4.5.1.

+ JDK 1.2.2 + Java Plug-In 1.2.2 on clients. A lot of applied code depend on Java 2 APIs, javax/swing is actively used as well. But the customer decide to use Microsoft VM both on server and client sides - they have support contract (for other products) with MS and MS may decide to cancel support if our customer will use Sun JDK and Sun JVM. So, I have to try to port all project to MS SDK for Java and the question is: Do I have a chance not to rewrite 100% of my code? Somewhere I read: ':I've downloaded the new MS Virtual Machine (msjavx86.exe) that should be compatible to Java2:' - is it really so?

Does anybody knows if MS will support Java 2 platform specifications? As I found at MS, latest MS JDK 4.0 (on which WLS 5.1 can run) meets specification of Java 1.1 and after installing it I found that I must rewrite about 90% of my code. Can someone clarify the situation with MS JDK?

Thanks in advance, Andrey Bogush PS: Any information, links, documents, overviews on how to persuade the customer to use Sun JDK and JVM against MS one are VERY and STRONGLY welcome!!! Andrey Bogush wrote: Hi All! My company is developing big project using WLS 4.5.1. + JDK 1.2.2 + Java Plug-In 1.2.2 on clients. A lot of applied code depend on Java 2 APIs, javax/swing is actively used as well. But the customer decide to use Microsoft VM both on server and client sides - they have support contract (for other products) with MS and MS may decide to cancel support if our customer will use Sun JDK and Sun JVM.MS can cancel their support if they use Sun's JDK! That's an 'interesting' clause in your support contract.

So, I have to try to port all project to MS SDK for Java and the question is: Do I have a chance not to rewrite 100% of my code? Somewhere I read: ':I've downloaded the new MS Virtual Machine (msjavx86.exe) that should be compatible to Java2:' - is it really so?I don't believe any versions of Microsoft's JVMs support Java2. Personally, I think it would be a big waste of time to port working Java2 code to JDK 1.1 just to run MS's JVM. -- Rob Does anybody knows if MS will support Java 2 platform specifications? As I found at MS, latest MS JDK 4.0 (on which WLS 5.1 can run) meets specification of Java 1.1 and after installing it I found that I must rewrite about 90% of my code. Can someone clarify the situation with MS JDK? Thanks in advance, Andrey Bogush PS: Any information, links, documents, overviews on how to persuade the customer to use Sun JDK and JVM against MS one are VERY and STRONGLY welcome!!!

Hi experts Installing SOLMAN 7.0 EHP1 on Windows 2003 Server 64-bit OS and x86 processors. Based on the SAP Note:, Solution Manager requires 64-bit platform to get all services available. On 64-bit Solman 7.0 EHP1 installation, it requires only JDK with a minimum version 1.4.2_09 and not equal to or higher than version 5.0. For the JDK version, 1.4.2, it only supports IA 64 processors for windows operating system.

Please i need solution where we can use other Intel processors (like XEON, CORE, etc.) using JAVA JDK on 64-bit MS Windows OS. Hello,We have been installing CF 9.0 to IIS 7 on a new server for the first time. The installation was working fine until we tried to install add-ons such as the CF 9.01 installer or a Java JDK.

After one of these was installed, the CF 9 application server would not start. We got a message saying 'Windows could not start the ColdFusion 9 Application Server on Local Computer. For more information, review the System Event Log. If this is a non-Microsoft service, contact the service vendor, and refer to service-specific error code 2.'

We reviewed the System Event logs and found error logs saying 'The ColdFusion 9 Application Server service terminated with service-specific error They system cannot find the file specified.' The error did not state what file that is.We tried uninstalling and re-installing CF 9.0 a handful of times and then applied either the 9.01 installer or JDK. We continued to get above error message when trying to start services.Has anybody experienced this issue before?

How do you get around it? Thanks.Best regards,Chung Lee. I am not certain if this is the correct forum for posting JDK installation questions (for Windows XP)? If not, please direct me to the correct one.

I would like to install the JDK for the very first time but I noticed that I have at least two versions of the JRE and a few updates for both. Should I uninstall both JRE's and their updates before installing the latest JDK OR do I merely overinstall? I have the following: J2SE Runtime 5.0 Update 10 J2SE Runtime 5.0 Update 11 Java 2 Runtime, SE v1.4.2_01 Java 6 Update 20 Java SE Runtime 6 Update 1 Not sure what the difference between J2SE and Java 6 and whether or not I need both to run applications. Thanks in advance for clearing up my confusion. Probably not the best place to post this, but I am having trouble installing the JDK on my windows (64bit) machine. (from here After it seems like I have downloaded the installer file, I try to run it and nothing happens.

There is no evidence that it is executed at all. I tried to use the installer for netbeans IDE + jdk (jdk-7u4-nb-7_1_2-windows-ml.exe). All of the netbeans stuff is installed fine, but the jdk part fails, but at least this time it lets me know 'Installation of JDK 7 Update 4 was not completed.'

The log files just say there is an exception at org.netbeans.installer.utils.exceptions.InstallationException: JDK installation finished with error code 1. So it has worked fine on my other machine, I am at a loss here. Sorry again that I couldn't figure out where to post this. Hi, I'm installing SAP ECC 6.0 (IDES) with Netweaver 7.0 SAP ERP 6.0 - Microsoft Windows - ORACLE Database when the master installer asked for my JRE and JDK I installed the jre-8-windows-x64.exe and jdk-8-windows-x64.exe directly from Sun website but when I reach the JCE Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files I downloaded the jce_policy-8.zip directly from Sun website (Java Cryptography Extension (JCE) Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files for JDK/JRE 8 Download) but the master installer denied the file, said: The JCE policy files are from the wrong provider. SOLUTION: Download the JCE policy files from Sun what should I do? Clearly the file is really from Sun, but the master installer keep denying my file.

Hi, I'm installing SAP ECC 6.0 (IDES) with Netweaver 7.0 SAP ERP 6.0 - Microsoft Windows - ORACLE Database when the master installer asked for my JRE and JDK I installed the jre-8-windows-x64.exe and jdk-8-windows-x64.exe directly from Sun website but when I reach the JCE Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files I downloaded the jce_policy-8.zip directly from Sun website (Java Cryptography Extension (JCE) Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files for JDK/JRE 8 Download) but the master installer denied the file, said: The JCE policy files are from the wrong provider. SOLUTION: Download the JCE policy files from Sun what should I do? Clearly the file is really from Sun, but the master installer keep denying my file.